Satellite Liaison Blog

GOES-R & JPSS: The Future of Weather Satellites

  • Home
  • About the Blog

Arctic Donut in VIIRS Snowmelt RGB

Posted by Bill Line on 08/18/2022
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

No, VIIRS did not capture a Donut dropping powdered sugar near the North Pole! On 12-13 Aug 2022, the VIIRS Snowmelt RGB revealed a Polar Mesoscale Cyclone depositing fresh snow across the Arctic, which was apparent under the clear skies in its wake (Fig 1 and 2). The unique combination of spectral channels, not available on GOES-R series ABI, allows for one to differentiate fresher snow cover from older snow cover and ice (see other examples here and here). In this case, the most recent snow cover is obvious as a trail of a relatively lighter shade of blue atop the darker shades of the older snow cover. In fact, one may note three distinct shades of blue, or snow ages, in this domain. The background/oldest snowpack on ice appears as the darkest shade of blue, the most recent swath the lightest, and a series of swaths perpendicular to the recent swath that exhibit shades of blue somewhere in the middle (Fig 3).

Figure 1: 12-13 Aug 2022 VIIRS Snowmelt RGB near the North Pole.
Figure 2: Zoomed out still image from Figure 1.
Figure 3: Annotated still image from Fig 1.

The Snowmelt RGB can be useful operationally, including at lower latitudes, for determining the type of precipitation that has fallen (rain, snow, freezing rain), assessing the blowability or runoff/flooding potential of snow cover, and as a tool to determining cloud microphysics. The VIIRS Snowmelt RGB can be viewed online at the CIRA SLIDER, and very soon, to a CIRA SLIDER – VIIRS CONUS sector to better accommodate the viewing of VIIRS imagery over CONUS.

Bill Line (NESDIS/STAR), Curtis Seaman (CIRA), John Forsythe (CIRA), Carl Dierking (UA/GINA)

GOES-18 ABI Interleave

Posted by Bill Line on 08/01/2022
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

GOES-West Operational Interleave began today (8/1) at 1700 UTC, and will continue through Sep 6. What does this mean to NWS users? GOES-West ABI Imagery (single-band imagery, band differences, RGBs) is now from GOES-18. Other GOES-West products, such as from GLM, and ABI derived products (cloud products, TPW, DMWs, etc) remain from GOES-17. Hence, “Interleave”. Why? GOES-18 ABI Imagery reached Provisional Validation maturity on July 28, meaning it is suitable for the broad user community. We are also entering a GOES-17 ABI Warm Period, which results in degraded GOES-17 LWIR imagery due to the cooling system failure. Therefore, the GOES-18 imagery will be distributed instead of that from GOES-17 from 8/1 to 9/6. The transition on 8/1 was successful, with GOES-18 imagery appearing in NWS AWIPS, as well as webpages like CIRA SLIDER and the STAR GOES Image Viewer.

From an AWIPS SBN perspective, no changes were needed at the individual locations. GOES-West imagery (from GOES-18) is loaded from the menu system as one normally would. Procedures containing GOES-West imagery load as usual. If you load imagery from the product browser, you will notice the addition of GOES-18 to the “Satellite” drop-down. The GOES-18 label will now appear in the product legend. GOES-West meso sector requests will continue as usual, with the meso sector imagery coming from GOES-18.

One may notice vertical striping at night in the Nighttime Microphsyics RGB and Nighttime Fog Difference. Details of the subtle GOES-18 Ch07 “Barcode Artifact” can be found here.

The transition from GOES-17 to GOES-18 imagery at 1700 UTC is shown below in various Imagery products. All examples begin with GOES-17, and transition to GOES-18 after 1700 UTC (midway through each animation). All examples are saved from AWIPS (SBN dataflow), with the exception of Geocolor, which was captured from CIRA SLIDER. Since we are already entering the warm period, the imagery degradation can be seen in the impacted GOES-17 imagery.

Starting with Ch08 Water Vapor imagery, the transition from GOES-17 to GOES-18 at 1700 UTC is obvious, as the horizontal striping associated with the cooling system failure is apparent in the GOES-17 portion of the animation, but abruptly disappears in the GOES-18 portion. The GOES-18 imagery appears as one would expect, similar to that from GOES-16.

Figure 1: GOES-17 and GOES-18 Ch08 Water Vapor Imagery.

GOES-17 Ch13 is not as impacted by the cooling system failure, and therefore, the transition to GOES-18 is very smooth with no noticeable changes in imagery.

Figure 2: GOES-17 and GOES-18 Ch13 IR Imagery.

Split Window Difference imagery, which is used for the detection of blowing dust and moisture gradients, appears significantly cleaner in the GOES-18 imagery. Channel differences typically enhance noise present in imagery.

Figure 3: GOES-17 and GOES-18 Split Window Difference Imagery.

The Airmass RGB, which includes multiple LWIR channel differences, is also notably improved with the transition to GOES-18.

Figure 4: GOES-17 and GOES-18 Ch08 Airmass RGB Imagery.

The Nighttime Microphsyics RGB, which also employs multiple IR channel differences, exhibits significant noise in the GOES-17 portion, and very little in the GOES-18 portion. Note, this animation is during the daytime, so influence of the ch07 “Barcode Artifact” is not apparent here in GOES-18 imagery.

Figure 5: GOES-17 and GOES-18 Nighttime Microphysics RGB.

GOES-17 to GOES-18 1-min mesoscale sector imagery is shown in the next animation. The transition to GOES-18 after 1700 UTC is not discernible.

Figure 6: GOES-17 and GOES-18 1-min VIS.

The transition is also seamless in Geocolor imagery, shown in the final figure from GOES-17 and GOES-18 full disk imagery.

Figure 7: GOES-17 and GOES-18 10-min Geocolor.

Bill Line, NESDIS/STAR and CIRA

GOES-18 Band 07 Barcode Artifact

Posted by Bill Line on 07/29/2022
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

GOES-18, the third satellite in the GOES-R series, launched on March 1, 2022. First light ABI imagery from 89.5W was released on May 11 and can also be found here and here. GOES-18 completed its drift to the ~GOES-West position on June 6. Early GOES-18 ABI imagery from this position can be found here and here and in the article/video here. The cooling system on the GOES-18 ABI was redesigned in order to prevent the issues that plague the GOES-17 ABI during certain time periods (GOES-17 LHP info). The redesign was successful, as the cooling system on GOES-18 is working as expected. GOES-18/GOES-17 interleave begins on August 1, meaning NWS users will be viewing GOES-18 imagery in AWIPS (instead of GOES-17) through September 6 (during the ABI Warm Period).

There is a minor artifact apparent in the GOES-18 Channel 07 3.9 um “shortwave IR” channel and associated multispectral products (band differences and RGBs). This artifact is not related to the cooling system, which is working correctly on GOES-18 ABI. Since this artifact is noticeable in some imagery products at times, it is important to acknowledge its appearance in the single-channel imagery as well as in multispectral imagery products. Given its appearance in imagery as a dynamic series of vertical striping, as you will see below, the artifact has been dubbed the “Barcode Artifact”. A Satellite Book Club Webinar discusses the issue in detail (link). This post will introduce the impact of the “Barcode Artifact” on the various imagery products available in NWS AWIPS that leverage the 3.9 um channel. The GOES-18 Transition to Operations page here also includes information on the Barcode Artifact (Downloadable PowerPoint). All of the imagery in this blog post was created in AWIPS from the CMIP files.

Summary up front: The “Barcode Artifact” is most apparent in band differences involving the 3.9 um band and in RGBs using those band differences. Most notable to NWS users is the presence of the artifact in the Night Fog Difference and Nighttime Microphsyics RGB. The artifact is most noticeable in cold scenes such as overnight, and in cold cloud tops. The vertical striping is very subtle in the 3.9 um single band imagery and associated RGBs (FireT RGB). The artifact appears to mostly serve as an annoyance, and should not impact a forecasters ability to analyze the imagery and diagnose relevant features.

The “Barcode Artifact” is not easily seen in single-band 3.9 um imagery. Therefore, routine day-to-day monitoring of the single-band 3.9 um imagery, such as for wildfire hot spots, when using typical ranges and colormaps, will not be impacted. The example in Figure 1 is of the single-band 3.9 um imagery over the western US from 12Z on July 23 to 12Z on July 24 with the AWIPS default rainbow colormap and default range of -109C to 127C. Compare the GOES-18 example in Fig 1 with the GOES-17 example in Fig 2. The imagery appears almost identical, but a keen eye can spot differences in the cold cloud tops over the southeast portion of the scene, as well as over the ocean during the overnight periods, with shifting and subtle vertical striping present in the GOES-18 imagery and not GOES-17.

Figure 1: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.
Figure 2: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-17 Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.

Some may prefer a grayscale colormap when viewing 3.9 um imagery (black = warm to white = cold BTs), such as that shown in Figure 3, still with the default range. In this example, the only apparent artifact is again barely observed in the cold storm tops to the southeast and over the ocean overnight.

Figure 3: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.

Using the same grayscale colormap, but spreading the range of colors across a smaller range of values (0C to 32C), the artifact finally becomes more apparent (Fig 4). The series of inconsistent vertical striping is detectable to the human eye at night across the full scene (start and end of animation), but especially offshore and in clouds. In comparison, the artifact is not present in similarly stretched GOES-17 imagery (Fig 5).

Figure 4: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.
Figure 5: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-17 Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.

The Fire Temperature RGB leverages the single-band 3.9 um channel for hot spot detection. A day/night example over wildfires in Idaho reveals no noise that would hinder a forecasters ability to diagnose hot spots or other features (Fig 6). In this RGB, only values greater than 0C in the 3.9 um band contribute to the red component (relatively warm BTs), hence a lack of striping.

Figure 6: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Fire Temperature RGB Imagery.

Another vital role of the 3.9 um channel is for low cloud and fog detection, when combined with the longwave IR clean window (10.3 um) channel in the “Night Fog” difference. This is where the the artifact becomes more noticeable in areas. In this blog post, the 10.3 um – 3.9 um difference is used with the AWIPS default fogdiff_blue colormap. Positive values, or light blue to dark blue, represent liquid cloud tops (lower-level clouds and fog), shades of gray to black are ice cloud tops (higher-level clouds).

During the same period and in the same location as in Fig 1, an array of vertically oriented stripes or bands is readily apparent shifting across the scene in the Night Fog Difference (Fig 7). The artifact is most apparent at night (start and end of loop), and in both cloud tops and clear skies over land and water. Despite the artifact, the various cloud features across the domain are still easily diagnosed and differentiated by the professional analyst. If users are aware of this artifact, other than being a slight annoyance, there should be little to no impact on ones ability to perform cloud analysis. In some instances, a cloud feature falling on the gradient of colors in a given colormap may appear to flash in and out artificially, particularly in the coldest of scenes (Alaska example below). Animations of images help the user to comprehend close to the actual cloud location/appearance.

Figure 7: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Night Fog Difference imagery.

Figure 8 includes a corresponding animation of the Night Fog difference from GOES-17. Notice the presence of horizontal striping during the nighttime hours, which are associated with the cooling system issue. The vertical “Barcode Artifact” apparent in the previous GOES-18 example is not detectable in the similarly scaled GOES-17 imagery.

Figure 8: 12Z 23 Jul 2022 to 12Z 24 Jul 2022 GOES-17 Night Fog Difference imagery.

Of course, the fog difference is an important component to a couple of AWIPS RGBs, namely the Nighttime Microphysics RGB. The vertical striping appears similarly in the RGB as it does in the fog difference, as is shown in Figure 9 zoomed in over southern CA and adjacent waters during the overnight period. GOES-17 imagery of the same product and timeframe does not show the artifact (Fig 10).

Figure 9: 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery.
Figure 10: 24 Jul 2022 GOES-17 Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery.

The more advanced “Geocolor” product also leverages the Night Fog difference (for low clouds) at night to highlight low clouds and fog as blue. The vertical striping appears similar across the region of low clouds as in previous examples, with analysis of low clouds still able to be accomplished (Fig 11).

Figure 11: 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Geocolor imagery.

The Day-Snow Fog RGB also incorporates the (reverse) Fog Difference (Fig 11-2). Vertical striping is not observable in this example, which isn’t surprising given it is a daytime and low-level application.

Figure 11-2: 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Day Snow Fog RGB imagery.

This fog difference is also included in the Day Cloud Convection RGB. In this case, the difference is leveraged during the day to differentiate small ice particles in the cloud top as a sign of active updraft regions, yellow in the RGB (Fig 12). The artifact is barely detectable in the cold storm tops in this RGB and example, and the important features and colors can be analyzed as with GOES-16 and GOES-17.

Figure 12: 24 Jul 2022 GOES-18 Day Convection RGB imagery.

The previous examples are from the GOES-18 5-min PACUS sector, but the “Barcode Artifact” appears similarly across the Full Disk Sector and Mesoscale sectors. The example below reveals the appearance of the artifact in mesoscale 1-min Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery off the southwest US coast on the morning of June 9 (Fig 13).

Figure 13: 09 Jun 2022 GOES-18 1-min Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery.

Alaskan NWS users will also notice the “Barcode Artifact” in GOES-18 imagery. Given the longer cool season, longer nights in the winter, and cooler temperatures overall, the artifact should appear more often in this imagery. The examples in Figures 14, 15, and 16 show GOES-18 1-min grayscale Ch07 single band imagery (-60C to 100C), the Fog Difference (-15C to 15C), and Nighttime Microphysics RGB from 12Z to 15Z on the morning of June 30 over the Aleutian Islands. The artifact is present across the cool scene, especially in the high-level cloud tops, but the various cloud features are still diagnosed and differentiated. As alluded to previously, some areas of low clouds (blue) in cool air mass cases such as this one appear to flash in and out due to the dynamic pattern of the vertical striping.

Figure 14: 30 Jun 2022 GOES-18 1-min Ch07 Shortwave IR imagery.
Figure 15: 30 Jun 2022 GOES-18 1-min Night Fog Difference imagery.
Figure 16: 30 Jun 2022 GOES-18 1-min Nighttime Microphysics RGB imagery.

From around Hawaii, the the Fog Difference is shared during an overnight period (Fig 17). The banding is much less obvious compared to over Alaska, given the relatively warmer scene involved.

Figure 17: 13 Jul 2022 GOES-18 1-min Night Fog Difference imagery.

This post shared GOES-18 examples of imagery products, available in NWS AWIPS, that include the 3.9 um channel as a component, in order to characterize the impact of the “Barcode Artifact”. While the artifact is not readily apparent in the single-band imagery, it becomes obvious in channel differences (such as the Night Fog Difference), and multispectral products (RGBs and Geocolor) that leverage the differences, as a series of shifting vertical striping. The artifact is most apparent in cold scenes, such as at night, and in relatively cold cloud tops. In most situations, analysis of a scene should not be significantly hampered by the noise, and the user will view it as a slight annoyance. In particularly cold scenes, and depending on the colormap and range used, a given cloud feature may appear to flicker. Engineers continue to work toward a solution to the GOES-18 Channel 07 “Barcode Artifact”.

This CIMSS Satellite Blog also shares information about the “Barcode Artifact”.

Bill Line, NESDIS/STAR and CIRA

Colorado Tornado, Parallax, and 30-sec Imagery

Posted by Bill Line on 07/07/2022
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

A long-lived thunderstorm traveling across northeast Colorado produced a reported Tornado near Fort Morgan, CO late in the afternoon on 6 July 2022. Partially overlapped GOES-West mesoscale sectors yielded 30-second imagery over the region. Recall, the partially overlapped 30-sec imagery cannot be viewed by default in AWIPS, but a simple menu addition unlocks the capability. Figure 1 shows the two GOES-West 1-min mesoscale sectors, offset in time by 30-sec, with the overlap region containing the 30-sec imagery highlighted in yellow.

Figure 1: 6 July 2022 GOES-West Meso-1 and Meso-2 1-min sectors, with 30-sec overlap region highlighted in the yellow box.

Focusing on the supercell thunderstorm associated with the tornado report, a clear and long-lived Above Anvil Cirrus Plume, indicative of a particularly strong storm, is present through the 75 minute period (Figure 2). Also notable from the imagery is the orientation of the NWS Tornado warning polygons and Tornado LSRs with respect to the thunderstorm, and updraft region in particular, to the southwest. This is due to parallax, as the thunderstorm top is oriented away from the satellite sub-point, which in the case of GOES-West viewing the central high plains, is an orientation to the north and east of the ground feature. See this post for a graphic on parallax.

Figure 2: 06 July 2022 GOES-West 30-second visible imagery over northeast Colorado supercell, with NWS warning polygons and Local Storm Reports overlay. GIF animation

Bill Line, NESDIS/STAR and CIRA

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 2,300 other followers
  • Keyword Search

  • RSS Satellite Liaison Blog

    • Arctic Donut in VIIRS Snowmelt RGB 08/18/2022
    • GOES-18 ABI Interleave 08/01/2022
    • GOES-18 Band 07 Barcode Artifact 07/29/2022
    • Colorado Tornado, Parallax, and 30-sec Imagery 07/07/2022
    • GOES-18 Goes West 06/15/2022
    • High Plains Accumulating Hail – 07 June 2022 06/08/2022
    • Memorial Day 2022 Severe 05/31/2022
    • GOES-18 Captures Fires and Severe Thunderstorms 05/12/2022
    • First Light GOES-18 Imagery 05/12/2022
    • 8 May 2022 Blowing Dust 05/09/2022
  • August 2022
    S M T W T F S
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
    « Jul    
  • Archives

    • August 2022 (2)
    • July 2022 (2)
    • June 2022 (2)
    • May 2022 (4)
    • April 2022 (7)
    • March 2022 (5)
    • February 2022 (3)
    • January 2022 (4)
    • December 2021 (2)
    • November 2021 (2)
    • October 2021 (2)
    • September 2021 (2)
    • August 2021 (3)
    • June 2021 (2)
    • May 2021 (1)
    • April 2021 (3)
    • March 2021 (5)
    • February 2021 (1)
    • January 2021 (4)
    • December 2020 (5)
    • November 2020 (1)
    • October 2020 (5)
    • September 2020 (1)
    • August 2020 (4)
    • June 2020 (4)
    • May 2020 (4)
    • April 2020 (8)
    • March 2020 (9)
    • February 2020 (6)
    • January 2020 (4)
    • December 2019 (3)
    • November 2019 (1)
    • October 2019 (5)
    • September 2019 (2)
    • August 2019 (5)
    • July 2019 (2)
    • June 2019 (1)
    • May 2019 (5)
    • April 2019 (7)
    • March 2019 (4)
    • February 2019 (4)
    • January 2019 (3)
    • December 2018 (2)
    • November 2018 (7)
    • October 2018 (3)
    • September 2018 (3)
    • August 2018 (1)
    • July 2018 (8)
    • June 2018 (5)
    • May 2018 (4)
    • April 2018 (5)
    • March 2018 (7)
    • February 2018 (5)
    • January 2018 (4)
    • December 2017 (4)
    • November 2017 (7)
    • October 2017 (9)
    • September 2017 (6)
    • August 2017 (12)
    • July 2017 (5)
    • June 2017 (9)
    • May 2017 (8)
    • April 2017 (17)
    • March 2017 (20)
    • October 2016 (1)
    • August 2016 (1)
    • July 2016 (1)
    • May 2016 (1)
    • March 2016 (2)
    • February 2016 (1)
    • October 2015 (1)
    • August 2015 (1)
    • July 2015 (1)
    • April 2015 (3)
    • March 2015 (3)
    • February 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (1)
    • October 2014 (1)
    • September 2014 (3)
    • August 2014 (4)
    • July 2014 (1)
    • June 2014 (4)
    • May 2014 (9)
    • April 2014 (5)
    • March 2014 (3)
    • February 2014 (1)
    • January 2014 (1)
    • December 2013 (1)
    • November 2013 (1)
    • October 2013 (1)
    • June 2013 (2)
    • May 2013 (3)
    • April 2013 (1)
    • March 2013 (1)
    • February 2013 (2)
    • January 2013 (1)
    • December 2012 (1)
    • November 2012 (4)
    • October 2012 (10)
    • September 2012 (2)
    • August 2012 (1)
  • Categories

  • Tags

    #G16 #GOES16 Air Mass Product Cloud Top Cooling CTC East Coast Storm EWP GOES-16 Heavy Rain Hurricane Sandy HWT Large Ocean Storm Mid-Atlantic Weather MODIS New England Weather North Atlantic ocean prediction center perfect storm satellite severe severe weather SPC srsor Texas VIIRS
Blog at WordPress.com.
Satellite Liaison Blog
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Satellite Liaison Blog
    • Join 2,300 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Satellite Liaison Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...