GOES-16 GLM data was utilized to help monitor storm activity near the site of the El Paso County Fair during the week of July 14 – July 21. The fair takes place in Calhan, which is in northeast El Paso County. During the late afternoon of July 17, a cluster of thunderstorms approached the fair grounds from the west. Given the potential for rain, breezy winds, and lightning (confirmed in GLM with CG’s confirmed by NLDN), EL Paso County Sheriff’s office was notified at around 2345 UTC. Figure 1 shows a 1-hour long loop updating every 1-minute, while Figure 2 is the same animation but with the break points discussed in the rest of this post.

Figure 1: 17 July 2018 clockwise from upper right: GLM Flash Extent Density (FED), GLM Average Flash Area (AFA), GLM Total Optical Energy (TOE), ABI VIS, KPUX 0.5 degree radar reflectivity, NLDN CG’s. GLM data is 5-min accumulation updating every 1-minute. Full res

By 0000 UTC (the middle of the loop), 0.5 degree radar reflectivity showed the eastern edge of a cell moving into Calhan, with NLDN confirming cloud to ground lightning strikes. However, GLM FED indicated lightning activity still well to the west of town. This discrepancy is due to parallax effect inherent in the GLM data. The GLM gridded data in AWIPS is formatted to the 2 km ABI fixed grid, so is influenced by the same parallax effect. In Colorado from GOES-East, lightning objects will appear slightly to the north and west of where it actually is occurring over the surface. Users will need to get used to the degree of the effect in their CWA, and use radar, NLDN, etc to confirm where that lightning is actually occurring.

By 0029 UTC (the end of the loop), radar and NLDN data would indicate Calhan in a gap of thunderstorm activity. However, GLM shows mainly long flashes continuing to extend over and around Calhan, implying a continued lightning threat away from the updraft cores and over the fair grounds.

Figure 2: 17 July 2018 annotated clockwise from upper right: GLM Flash Extent Density (FED), GLM Average Flash Area (AFA), GLM Total Optical Energy (TOE), ABI VIS, KPUX 0.5 degree radar reflectivity, NLDN CG’s. GLM data is 5-min accumulation updating every 1-minute. Full res

The Total Optical Energy Product was not found to provide any additional value over FED and AFA in this case.

Bill Line, NWS

The last couple of weeks have featured a few news stories on all the African dust in the Atlantic, some of which made it as far west as Houston and even Oklahoma City!  Is it normal to see this much dust in the Atlantic?  Yes!  In the central U.S.?  Well, maybe that part is a bit unusual.

It just so happens that we are running a Saharan Air Layer (SAL) Evaluation that started on 06/17/18 and will run until 09/30/18.  The participants include the National Hurricane Center, Weather Prediction Center, Melbourne, Ruskin, Miami, Key West, San Juan forecast offices, and the Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology in Barbados.  The concept is to test the utility of many different dust or moisture products as it relates to the SAL events with subtopics focusing on convection, air quality, visibility, and lightning.  By running an evaluation in this way (weather event focused), we hope to get valuable feedback from forecasters on which products perform well and which ones may need some work.  We will also be comparing dropwindsondes during special Hurricane Research Division (HRD) flights to the NOAA Unique Combined Atmospheric Profiles (NUCAPS) to increase confidence in the soundings over the tropical Atlantic.

I have included two animations of the SAL outbreaks from 07/05/18 – 07/11/18.  You may also notice Hurricane Beryl and Hurricane Chris forming on the edge of the larger outbreak that follows Beryl.  This dust was pulled rather far north and got wrapped up in the circulation of Chris, leading to an increase in lightning (not shown, yet).  Meanwhile, Beryl formed quickly, then dissipated quickly, but that appeared to be more due to the shear (very strong easterlies at low-levels), which caused decoupling from the convection.

GOES-16 Dust RGB showing a couple SAL outbreaks stretching across the tropical Atlantic. (Click here to open in a different window)

GOES-16 SAL Split-Window for a different prospective on the SAL outbreaks.  (Click here to open in a different window)

Stay tuned for more updates on the SAL evaluation and a look at some of the products that are being evaluated in operations.

Thanks for reading!

21 WFOs have the opportunity to participate in a pre-operational Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) evaluation starting late June 2018. Forecasters in the test offices are evaluating experiential GLM total lightning products in real-time in AWIPS-II. The initial products include Flash Extent Density (FED), Total Optical Energy (TOE), and Average Flash Area (AFA). The products are available as a 1-minute accumulation updating every 1-minute, and a 5-minute accumulation updating every 1-minute. The GLM data are re-navigated to the 2×2 km ABI fixed grid. These products were initially tested in the Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) and Operations Proving Ground (OPG) during this past spring. Visit the GOES-R HWT Blog for feedback from the HWT evaluation. The examples below are using 1-min updating 5-min accumulation GLM data with 1-min visible ABI imagery on 13 July 2018 from 2000 UTC to 2059 UTC for a strong thunderstorm in northern Iowa.

Flash Extent Density (FED): FED has been tested in NOAA testbeds and offices for several years leading up to the launch of GOES-R using proxy ground-based lightning data. It has been found to be a useful means of displaying gridded lightning data. This product represents the number of flashes that occur within a grid cell during the period of time (Fig 1). Rapid increases in this product indicate increasing updraft intensity and potential severe threat while decreases in FED would indicate weakening updraft.

Figure 1: 13 July 2018 GOES-16 1-min, 5-min accumulation GLM FED and 1-min ABI visible imagery. Full res

Total Optical Energy (TOE): Sum of all optical energy observed within each grid cell during the period. This is the closest portrayal to what GLM is actually sensing (Fig 2).

Figure 2: 13 July 2018 GOES-16 1-min, 5-min accumulation GLM TOE and 1-min ABI visible imagery. Full res

Average Flash Area (AFA): Average area of all flashes spatially coincident with each 2×2 km grid cell during the period (Fig 3). Smaller flashes indicate newer flashes, and are typical of the core updraft region. Longer flashes are typical in the anvil away from the updraft core, and highlight storms that are capable of producing strikes far from the updraft core.

Figure 3: 13 July 2018 GOES-16 1-min, 5-min accumulation GLM AFA and 1-min ABI visible imagery. Full res

GLM has an advantage over ground-based lightning networks in that it detects the extent of lightning flashes instead of a single point, and has uniform detection efficiency across a large domain. Ground-based networks are able to differentiate cloud-to-ground and in-cloud lightning flashes. Therefore, a forecaster gets the greatest benefit when using GLM in tandem with ground-based lightning data.

The figure 4 4-panel includes all three GLM lightning products plus NLDN point CG lightning data and ABI visible imagery. Notice the long flashes extending well into the anvil northwest of the core updraft region. NLDN CG strikes are detected in this region. Meanwhile within the updraft, AFA is much smaller.

Figure 4: 13 July 2018 GOES-16 1-min, 5-min accumulation GLM FED (top left), AFA (top right), TOE (bottom right), ABI VIS and NLDN CG (bottom left). Full res

The thunderstorm produced a 49 mph wind gust around 2040 UTC, during the time of peak FED just before a decrease in FED and storm intesity.

In addition to providing forecasters with information about fluctuations in storm intensity, the GLM data will be utilized for alerting the public at outdoor events when lightning threatens.

Bill Line, NWS

Around 2045 UTC on 2 July 2018, the Pueblo County EM office called WFO Pueblo for assistance in pinpointing the location of smoke being reported near Custer/Fremont/Pueblo County lines. At the time of the call, no hot spots were apparent in GOES-16 3.9 um imagery. However, within a few minutes, a hot spot appeared in northeast Custer County, 5 miles west of Wetmore (Fig 1). WFO Pueblo returned the phone call and provided the lat/lon of the hot spot. Being in a remote and wooded area, the early and more precise geolocation of the fire was helpful for getting crews on scene quickly. This fire is called the “Adobe Fire”, and was last reported as 20 acres on Monday afternoon.

Figure 1: 2 July 2018 GOES-16 5-min 3.9 um shortwave IR imagery. Loop ends at time when hot spot was obvious, and when return phone call was made. Full res

Bill Line, NWS